The OldGold Purdue Sports Net: SEARCH | PRIVACY | COPYRIGHT | DISCLAIMER | CONTACT | LINK EX | DONATE | ADVERTISE
Celebrating 20 years on the Internet in March of 2015 !
Boiler UP!
Hammer Down!
Covering Boilermaker
Athletics since 1995!
Current Site Visitors Online:
69 visitors
OldGoldFreePress.com
HOME
BASKETBALL
MENS HOOPS MAIN
RECRUITING (M)
BOILERS IN THE PROS
WOMEN HOOPS MAIN
RECRUITING (W)
FORUMS
FOOTBALL
FOOTBALL MAIN
RECRUITING
FORUMS
OLYMPIC SPORTS
VOLLEYBALL
SPORTS NEWS
SPORTS NEWS
SPORTS NEWS (FACEBOOK)
COLUMNISTS
SPORTS NEWS ARCHIVE
BLOGS
The Purdue 'BBB'
Brad's Boilermaker Blog
PURDUE FORUMS
MENS HOOPS
WOMENS HOOPS
FOOTBALL
FOOTBALL RECRUITING
TICKET BOARD
OLYMPIC SPORTS
COMMENTS, IDEAS,
and/or SUGGESTIONS
BIG TEN LINKS
BIG TEN SPORTS FORUMS
BIG TEN MEDIA
BIG TEN NEWSPAPERS
SPECIAL FEATURES
10 TICKETS
PURDUE PREDICTIONS
OLD GOLD STORE
JOHN PURDUE CLUB

 

OldGoldFreePress COLUMNISTS | BACK TO Guest_Columnist'S COLUMNS

PURDUE MENS BASKETBALL:
Purdue 58, Indiana 85

Published: 1/13/2007
Author: MDC
© Old Gold Free Press Columnists

BOX SCORE: Purdue 58, Indiana 85

As I sat there watching the game tonight, I was reminded of the first time I traveled to Assembly Hall to watch a Purdue-Indiana game. The year was 1975 and a young Purdue team that featured a starting line-up of Wayne Walls, Walter Jordan, Bruce Parkinson, John Garrett and Eugene Parker got absolutely blown out of the gym 104-71. Tonight's score wasn't quite that bad (85-58), but it was still a resounding defeat for Purdue and I felt just as bad after the game as I did then. I don’t think there is any point in trying to recap the game except to say that Purdue got off to a bad start and then let the game get completely out of hand early in the second half when they appeared to lose their poise.

The primary reason Indiana won tonight is evident from the box score. Purdue’s five starters played a total of 138 minutes and scored 50 points on 15-of-34 shooting including 2-of-4 from beyond the arc. They also had 17 rebounds and 13 turnovers. Indiana’s five starters played 126 minutes and scored 39 points on 14-of-32 shooting including 4-of-13 from beyond the arc. They also had 20 rebounds and 10 turnovers. If the game had just been 5-on-5, Purdue probably wouldn’t have fared too badly. Unfortunately for Purdue, each team was allowed to substitute and Indiana’s bench played magnificently while Purdue’s bench was basically nonexistent. How bad was it? Purdue’s reserves played a total of 62 minutes and scored eight points on 4-of-12 shooting including a woeful 0-for-5 from beyond the arc. They added five rebounds and four turnovers. Indiana’s reserves played a total of 74 minutes and scored 46 points on 15-of-19 shooting including 6-of-7 from beyond the arc. They added nine rebounds and four turnovers. The two guys that absolutely killed Purdue were A.J. Ratliff and Joey Shaw.

I’ve thought all along that for Purdue to be a good team, they need to get positive contributions from everyone, but particularly from the first eight players. In the three Big Ten games to date, Purdue’s bench has played a total of 161 minutes and scored a grand total of 20 points on 8-of-29 shooting. Chris Lutz, who averaged 7.4 ppg in the Big Ten last year, has yet to make a basket or a free throw in three Big Ten games. Lutz is 0-for-7, all 3-pointers, and has yet to attempt a free throw. It’s not like he’s not getting an opportunity to play either, he’s played 53 minutes. Tarrance Crump is not much better. He’s played 49 minutes and scored six points on 3-of-9 shooting. His assist-to-turnover ratio is 2-to-5 and he continues to look lost in the half-court. Marcus Green has played the fewest minutes (36) and scored the most points (12 on 4-of-9 shooting) so at least he’s been somewhat productive. What all this tells me is that Matt and the coaching staff need to go back to the drawing board in terms of who starts and who comes off the bench. It’s been my experience that there are just some guys who play better if they start and I’m beginning to wonder if Crump and Lutz aren’t two of them. One thing is for sure. If these two guys don’t elevate their games, Purdue is in for a very long Big Ten season because I don't think the five starters are capable of beating most Big Ten teams all by themselves. If these guys need a lesson in how important it is to come off the bench and play well, they need look no further than tonight’s game.

I’m not going to go through what I thought of each player’s performance tonight except to say that I thought Landry, Teague, Watt and Kramer all played reasonably well and everyone else struggled. I thought Indiana played exceptionally well on the defensive end and once they broke Purdue’s spirit, their offense got going as well. From what I have seen, there isn't anybody in the Big Ten that plays as well as Indiana does at the defensive end and if they keep shooting the ball well from the perimeter, they will be a hard team to beat, especially in the Hall of Calls.

Oh, one other thing. Exactly 28 days after being blown out by Indiana 104-71, the very same 1974/75 Purdue team came within a whisker of handing them their first defeat of the year and ended up losing in Mackey 83-82. What that tells me is that all is not lost just because Purdue laid an egg tonight. Hopefully the coaching staff will go back to Mackey, take a look at the tape, and then try to make some adjustments in how they are managing their personnel. After three Big Ten games, it’s pretty clear (at least it’s clear to me (LOL)) that what they are doing isn’t working and it’s time to try something else.

As news organizations move their stories to an archive, some of the links listed above may become inactive

OldGoldFreePress COLUMNISTS
OGFP_Staff -Career Blocked Shots Rankings
Bob_Richards -Women's Recruiting Update: Liza Clemons No. 1
Steve -Opponent #11: University of Wisconsin
MDC -NCAA: (5 seed) Purdue 76 - (4 seed) Washington 74
Capri_Small -Purdue 76, Western Illinois 44
Jimmy_D - Gazing into the Crystal Bubble, Part III: SEC / Big Ten / PAC 10
Brad_Jewell -Introducing Purdue Sports News via Facebook
Bob_Sienicki -Nike Camp: Elena Delle Donne Interview
Bob_Sternvogel -Nike Camp Report #1 (Sparks and Monarchs)
Guest_Columnist -Gazing into the Crystal Bubble, Part III: The SEC/Big Ten/PAC 10
Others -Purdue Sports Info
 
Current Site Visitors Online:
69 visitors

Share Share

 
OldGoldFreePress.com is organized & maintained by a group of college sports reporters with the help of Purdue sports fans everywhere. OldGoldFreePress.com is an independent and unofficial Purdue (+ Big Ten Conference/NCAA) sports news site that is not affiliated with Purdue University, the Big Ten Conference, the NCAA and/or any university athletic program.

Current Site Visitors Online:
69 visitors

Share Share

© OldGoldFreePress.com 1995-2014